Identification and Counterfactuals for Program Evaluation of Career and Technical Education
Evaluating CTE programs requires identifying a control group of students, or counterfactual. This paper from the CTE Research Network's Definitions and Measures Workgroup presents a series of case studies assessing the counterfactual for a selection of experimental and quasi-experimental CTE program evaluations.
Abstract: This paper considers recent efforts to conduct experimental and quasi-experimental evaluations of career and technical education programs. It focuses on understanding the counterfactual, or control population, for these program evaluations, discussing how the educational experiences of the control population might vary from those of the treated population and the ways in which the treatment and control populations used for evaluation may differ from each other. The paper begins by discussing the key identification strategies and the associated assumptions used to identify program effects, including regression and propensity score matching, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity designs, randomized controlled trials, and lottery-based admissions. It then presents a series of case studies evaluating the counterfactual for specific studies that used each identification strategy.
This resource is part of our Network collection of CTE Research Fundamentals.